The emotional landscape of divorce is complex - anger, grief, and sadness are natural responses to this life transition. But the tone you set with your spouse when asking for (or responding to) a divorce can shape your entire divorce journey. It can mean the difference between a 3 month divorce process or a 3 year divorce process. It can mean the difference between a divorce that costs a few thousand dollars, to one that costs tens of thousands of dollars. While anger, grief, or sadness are valid and important to process, leading with strong emtions when making legal decisions often results in costly mistakes and prolonged conflict. The key is recognizing that while your emotions are real, your process for resolving legal divorce issues doesn't have to be driven by them. Instead, try viewing this moment as an opportunity for a new chapter, a chance for a fresh start. From this perspective, divorce becomes what it ultimately needs to be - both an opportunity and a problem to solve. This approach can transform what could be an expensive, drawn-out court battle into a more efficient process that protects your wallet, your timeline, and your future. Managing Conflict and Strong Emotions in DivorceHaving strong emotions—or dealing with a spouse who does—doesn't disqualify you from collaborative problem-solving. In fact, this structured approach becomes even more valuable when emotions run high. The key is not to eliminate emotions (that's impossible), but to work with them productively. Emotional management is a skill—one that can be developed and strengthened with practice and support. Just as you might work with a personal trainer to build physical strength, working with a divorce therapist helps build emotional resilience. They can teach you practical techniques for managing triggers, processing grief, and staying focused on solutions rather than conflict. This work goes hand-in-hand with the mindset shift necesssary for a successful divorce. Instead of viewing divorce as a battle to win, recognize it as the foundation of your next life chapter. The decisions you make and the approach you take during divorce will shape your future long after the papers are signed. This isn't just positive thinking—it's a strategic choice that impacts everything from co-parenting relationships to financial stability. When you shift from "winning the battle" to "building your future," you're better equipped to:
If your spouse is being combative or uncooperative, remember that you can't control their behavior, but you can control your response. Work with professionals who know how to manage high-conflict situations—mediators and collaborative attorneys are trained to keep discussions productive even when emotions flare. Sometimes, simply having a structured process and professional buffer can help an antagonistic spouse shift from combat mode to problem-solving mode. Understanding the 3 Approaches to Problem-Solving in DivorceDivorce is, at its core, a complex problem in need of a solution. According to the research of J. Stuart Ablon[i], there are three fundamental ways to approach difficult problems:
Let's examine each one and how each applies to the legal divorce process. Plan A: Trying to Impose Your Will (Litigation)Most people's first instinct is to try forcing their preferred solution. In divorce, this means litigation—using the courts to impose your will on your spouse. However, research and experience show this approach is not only ineffective, it's inefficient. Litigation follows an adversarial template where accusations, blame, and strategic manipulation rule the day. Litigation in divorce nurtures:
Furthermore, litigation tends to produce the least satisfying results; it damages future relationships and is damaging to children as these factors are contrary to the needs and interests of children generally. Plan B: Collaborative Problem SolvingThis approach focuses on finding mutually satisfactory solutions through collaboration. It's not about being nice—it's about using a structured, scientifically-backed problem-solving approach that:
While this may seem like a pie-in-the-sky solution that feels out of reach, think again. Collaborative problem-solving has been successful in even the most difficult of places, including mental hospitals and prisons. Over 90% of all divorce cases in Utah are ultimately resolved by agreement; less than 5% of all Utah divorces end up in a formal trial. In other words, even if you decide to go full nuclear and litigate using the most aggressive, bull-dog attorney, you are still (all but) guaranteed to end up in court-mandated mediation where you will be asked to work with your soon-to-be ex spouse to reach a mutually agreed upon resolution. The questions become:
The pre-filing Collaborative process works even in high-conflict divorces. With the right professional support and structured process, you can work toward solutions even when emotions are intense or communication is strained. The key is understanding that collaboration doesn't require a cordial or amicable relationship with your spouse; it does, however require a civil tone and inclusive attitude and a commitment to finding workable solutions—with the help of professionals when needed. Thousands of couples who started in high conflict have successfully used this pre-filing approach to reach agreements that litigation could never achieve. Plan C: Complete SurrenderWhile some people surrender their decision-making power early in divorce, others reach this breaking point after exhausting themselves in litigation. It often unfolds like this: After spending months or years fighting through the courts, the aggressor realizes their "win at all costs" strategy isn't working. Drained emotionally and financially, they swing from one extreme (trying to control everything) to the other (giving up entirely). This surrender—whether it happens at the beginning or end of divorce—leads to unsustainable agreements, and creates even more resentment that often feeds conflict for years to come. While this might seem easier, it:
Our Divorce Resolution ProcessCombining decades of experience together with a scientifically demonstrated problem solving process, we suggest you approach your divorce in two phases: (1) First, set the foundation of your divorce, then (2) choose your legal team, your specific legal process, and select any other professional team members. PHASE 1: SET YOUR FOUNDATIONBefore filing for divorce, take time to prepare yourself for the journey ahead. Start by setting the foundation with careful planning and preparation. This includes the following:
Remember: This preparation is individual work—not joint planning with your spouse. PHASE 2: CHOOSE YOUR PROCESS WISELYWith your foundation set, select the most efficient path forward. At this stage you should choose your professional team and your resolution process. Will you each have a lawyer representing you? Perhaps one will hire a lawyer, and the other will represent themself? Remember, one lawyer can never represent both parties in a divorce. Another option may be that you proceed pro se? Don’t proceed with a court filing without knowing how you will both use legal services. When it comes to legal process, there are a number of paths. These include kitchen-table negotiations, divorce mediation, the Collaborative divorce process, arbitration, and litigation. Choose your path wisely; the divorce process you choose will have a direct and substantial impact on how much money you spend and how long the process will take. 1. Direct Negotiation (Kitchen Table) The simplest option—known as a kitchen table negotiation—may be an option if you and your spouse communicate well, can keep emotions in check, and are confident in your ability to reach an agreement together, on your own. The benefits of using a kitchen table negotiation include the following:
Couples that resolve their divorce using this approach should, at a minimum, use a consulting attorney to review paperwork before signing or finalizing anything. 2. Mediation & The Collaborative Process If you're facing power imbalances, communication challenges, or difficulty managing emotions, consider using a structured approach to resolve legal issues before filing your case—rather than turning to litigation. When it comes to divorcing couples, Mediation and the Collaborative divorce process provide effective structures for resolving disputes out of court. These structured approaches do two things: each one moves you toward an amicable resolution by providing you with needed support. Benefits of mediation include:
Mediation is particularly well-suited for unrepresented, or pro se, parties who engage consulting attorneys for guidance, as needed. In contrast, the Collaborative divorce process is ideal for those desiring comprehensive attorney representation throughout the negotiation process while remaining committed to staying out of court. The Collaborative divorce process in Utah is especially effective for couples with complex/high assets and/or children. If either you or your spouse desire full-scope style legal representation and you want to stay out of court, talk to your spouse about the benefits of a Collaborative divorce, including:
3. Arbitration Arbitration is a private method of resolving disputes. Similar to litigation, disputants follow an adversarial template, making allegations and accusations in written briefs and oral arguments before a private arbitrator. Unlike mediation, an arbitrator makes final decisions the parties must obey. While less formal than litigation, arbitration results in a legally binding decision that cannot be appealed. 4. Litigation Litigation relies on adversarial tactics to resolve disputes. Much like criminal cases, lawyers in adversarial divorce proceedings make accusations and assign blame in an effort to win or secure the most favorable outcome. Litigation should be a last resort, as it escalates conflict, costs, timelines, and is generally bad for children and families. While we aim to avoid court, sometimes it's necessary:
The Hidden Math of Divorce in Utah: How Conflict Multiplies CostsWhen emotions run high, costs soar. It's a simple equation: more conflict equals more time in the legal system, which means more money spent on your divorce. Consider these real-world examples:
Making Your Choice: A Decision That Impacts EverythingYour process choice creates a ripple effect through every aspect of your divorce: 1. Time Impact
2. Cost Impact
3. Emotional Impact
Take Action: Your Next Steps
The Bottom LineHow you approach your divorce directly impacts its cost, duration, and outcome. While litigation (Plan A) might feel powerful and surrender (Plan C) might feel easier, collaborative problem-solving (Plan B) consistently produces better results—even in high-conflict situations. Ready to solve your divorce problem efficiently? Contact us to discuss which approach might work best for your situation. [i] See J. Stuart Ablon, Changeable: How Collaborative Problem Solving Changes Lives at Home, at School, and at Work. June 5, 2018.
Comments are closed.
|
Jennifer L. Neeley
Jennifer has helped thousands of people get divorced without fighting in court. |